Module (NCG) 2019 MBA706
This module provides an introduction to research methods and provides an overview of the quantitative and qualitative methodologies that are needed in order to successfully carry out a research project.
The module will cover the major research methods (observation, surveys, case studies, interviews and action research), the implications of using them as well as the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data and presentation of findings.
It identifies how to develop research questions and how to produce a research proposal and research design considering the issues of data validation and reliability
This module provides a comprehensive introduction to research as practised in business and management disciplines. It provides an overview of the key quantitative and qualitative methodologies that are needed to undertake, evaluate and present a small scale research project. Following an introduction to research the module will move on to explore the major paradigms and debates in business research. It will help students to build appropriate strategies for reviewing literature and developing a coherent set of aims and objectives for a research study. The module will cover the major research methods (observation, surveys, case studies, interviews and action research), the implications of using them as well as the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data and presentation of findings. It identifies how to develop research questions/hypotheses and how to produce a robust and realistic research proposal and research design considering issues of data reliability, validation, and triangulation.
Aims and learning outcomes of the module
At the end of this module students should be able to:
- Interpret existing research as a prelude to carrying out further investigation and demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of a range of research designs and their appropriate utilisation
- Demonstrate critical thinking in comprehending relevant research articles.
- Critically evaluate a range of quantitative and qualitative research paradigms
- Competently analyse data appropriately in the context of both a qualitative and mixed method research project.
- Develop a robust research proposal appropriate for a Masters dissertation.
Reading list and additional learning resources
Core Reading
Bryman, A and Bell, E (2015) Business Research Methods. 4th Ed. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Recommended Supplementary Reading List
Bryman, A (2012) Social research methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coakes, SJ, Steed, LG & Ong, C (2010) SPSS Version 18.0 for Windows: Analysis without Anguish. Milton, Queensland: Wiley.
Coghlan, D and Brannick, T (2010) Doing Action Research in Your Own Organisation. London: Sage.
Collis, J and Hussey, R (2009), Business Research. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, JW (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
Gill, J and Johnson, P (2011) Research Methods for Managers. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Robson, C (2010) Real World Research. London: Blackwell.
Saunders, MNK, Thornhill, A and Lewis, P (2012) Research Methods for Business Students, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wallace, M & Sheldon, N (2015) ‘Business Research Ethics: Participant Observer Perspectives’. Journal of Business Ethics (128), pp. 267–277.
Journals
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1364-5579; 1464-5300 (on line)
Qualitative Research Journal, 1443-9883
Qualitative Research 1468-7941
Journal of Business Research
Additional resources to support your modules can be accessed within your programme area of Moodle.
Assessment
The summative assessment for this module will consist of one component: A research/work based proposal with a weighting of 100% (upper word limit 2500 words)
You must present the following for assessment for this module
| Assessment Tool | % Weighting as per assessment matrix | Learning Outcomes Covered:
| Assessment deadline date, time & location/method (Turnitin) |
| Research Proposal | 100% | 1,2,3,4 & 5 | Assessment due 04th May at 11.59 pm via Moodle. Feedback will be given 29.05.20
Resubmission : TBC |
Grading Criteria
| Grade | Generic Grading Criteria
| Contextualised Grading criteria |
| Excellent Outcome: 70% +
| Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Excellent grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives.
| Your work demonstrates excellent Harvard referencing and draws upon an extensive range of academic resources. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are of a very high standard with very few errors. Work is set out in an appropriate format and is written in a highly academic style. Work is very close to the guideline word limit. You have included all of the relevant sections and these are very detailed. Your research design is highly appropriate and justified. You have shown an excellent understanding of your chosen topic and you have provided an excellent rationale for the study. Your work is very well thought out and is an excellent example of a methodology. There are no omissions and the research is both valid and reliable.
|
| Above Average Outcome: 60-69%
| Most of the relevant information/skills accurately deployed. Good grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Good integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives.
| Your work demonstrates good Harvard referencing, with some minor errors and draws upon an above average range of academic resources. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are of a high standard with a few errors. Work is set out in an appropriate format and is written in an academic style. Work is close to the guideline word limit.
You have included all of the relevant sections and these are detailed. Your research design is appropriate and justified. You have shown an above average understanding of your chosen topic and you have provided a good rationale for the study. Your work is well thought out and is an above average example of a methodology. There are few omissions and the research is both valid and reliable.
|
| Average Outcome: 50-59%
| Much of the relevant information/skills mostly accurately deployed. Adequate grasp of the theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Fair integration of theory/practice/information in pursuit of the assessed work’sobjectives.
| Your work demonstrates an average attempt at Harvard referencing, with some errors present, and draws upon an adequate range of academic resources; there was scope to use more academic sources here. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are of an adequate standard with some errors. Work is set out in an appropriate format, with some omissions and an attempt is made to write in an academic style. Work may not be close to the guideline word limit.
You have included the relevant sections and these are somewhat detailed. Your research design is appropriate and, in places justified. You have shown an average understanding of your chosen topic and you have provided a rationale for the study. Your work demonstrates some thought and is an average example of a methodology. There are some omissions and the research shows some evidence of being reliable and valid.
|
| Satisfactory Outcome: 40-49%
| No major omissions or inaccuracies in the deployment of information/skills. Some grasp of theoretical/conceptual/practical elements. Integration of theory/practice/information present intermittently in pursuit of the assessed work’s objectives.
| Your work demonstrates some attempt at Harvard referencing, with errors present throughout, and draws upon a limited range of academic resources; there was much more scope to use more academic sources here. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are of a satisfactory standard with errors present throughout. An attempt is made to set work out in an appropriate format, but there are omissions. An attempt is made to write in an academic style, however this is limited. Work may not be close to the guideline word limit.
You have included most of the relevant sections but these could have been more detailed. Your research design is satisfactory however you could have justified this more. You have shown a satisfactory understanding of your chosen topic but there is a limited rationale for the study. Your work could have been better thought out and is a satisfactory example of primary research. There are some omissions and the research shows some, perhaps limited, evidence of being reliable and valid.
|
| Unsatisfactory Outcome: 30-39%
| Knowledge and understanding at limited level; may be errors both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding; expression of ideas not always clear, and argument/discussion weakly structured.
| Your work demonstrates limited attempt at Harvard referencing, there are frequent errors present throughout. Your work draws upon a very limited range of academic resources; there was much more scope to use more academic sources here. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are poor with errors present throughout. A limited attempt is made to set work out in an appropriate format, and there are omissions. A limited attempt is made to write in an academic style. Work is not close to the guideline word limit.
You have not included all of the relevant sections and these could have been more detailed. Your research design is flawed and you could have justified this more. You have shown a limited understanding of your chosen topic and there is a limited rationale for the study. Sections of your work need to be rewritten or structured and you need to demonstrate that primary research has been conducted. There are many omissions and the research shows limited evidence of being reliable and valid.
|
| Unsatisfactory Outcome: 15-29%
| Knowledge and understanding at limited level shown by significant errors and/or omissions both in terms of factual knowledge and understanding, with tendency to description rather than analysis; may include inability to express ideas clearly, lack of coherence in terms of structure, inclusion of irrelevant material.
| Your work demonstrates a very limited attempt at Harvard referencing, there are frequent errors present throughout. Your work draws upon a very limited range of academic resources; there was much more scope to use more academic sources here. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are very poor with errors present throughout. A very limited attempt is made to set work out in an appropriate format, and there are many omissions. A very limited attempt is made to write in an academic style. Work is not close to the guideline word limit.
You have not included all of the relevant sections and these require much more detail. Your research design is flawed and you have not justified this at all. You have shown a very limited understanding of your chosen topic and there is little rationale for the study. Sections of your work need to be rewritten or structured and you need to demonstrate that primary research has been conducted. There are many omissions and the research shows very limited evidence of being reliable and valid.
|
| Unsatisfactory Outcome: below 15%
| Overall lack of relevant information, descriptive not analytical; may also be repetitive, lack organisation, demonstrate inadequate use of language and inability to construct sentences.
| Your work demonstrates no Harvard referencing, there are frequent errors present throughout. Your work draws upon no academic resources. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are very poor with errors present throughout. A very limited attempt is made to set work out in an appropriate format, and there are many omissions. No attempt is made to write in an academic style. Work is not close to the guideline word limit.
You have not included all of the relevant sections and these require much more detail. Your research design is completely flawed and you have not justified this at all. You have shown a no understanding of your chosen topic and there is no rationale for the study. Most of your work needs to be rewritten or structured and you need to demonstrate that primary research has been conducted. You need to have a different topic and focus. There are many major omissions and the research shows no evidence of being reliable and valid.
|